Most analysts and investment professionals seek to determine whether to buy or sell
a stock by making a series of assumptions about future performance that often amount
to little more than educated guesses about the unknowable future. Because the future
is unknown, this process inevitably introduces a tremendous amount of uncertainty,
and slight changes to these assumptions can have a large impact on the final investment
decision criterion. We believe that this subjectivity often allows investors’ systematic
behavioral biases to cause stock prices to become misaligned with management’s ability
to deliver.
This makes the RBP® Methodology unique
in two ways. First, the RBP® Methodology
ignores the uncertain variables and chooses to focus instead on what is known –
the company’s stock price and historical financial statements. Each Transparent
Value analyst starts with a company’s current stock price and works backward to
determine the Required Business Performance®
to support the stock price. We believe this helps us to identify situations in which
behavioral biases have caused misalignment between stock prices and management’s
ability to deliver.
Second, the fact-driven, forecast-free nature of the RBP®
Methodology helps to minimize the amount of subjectivity contained in the investment
analysis process. We believe this approach prevents behavioral biases from influencing
our analysis.